Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jezus Factory Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Only claim of notability being 15 minutes of fame on a radio station. Doesn't satisfy notability guidelines. v/r - TP 02:31, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Jezus Factory Records

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable, token mentions by BBC only. Dennis Brown (talk) 21:58, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 24 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Σ  τ  c . 03:57, 31 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep The "token mentions" are being the independent label of the week on a BBC national radio program, with consequent ~15 minutes of coverage. There's nothing wrong with the other source in the article at nomination either, depite the nom's "BBC only". Thirdly, their samplers have been reviewed  and they release notable work by notable musicians. Sufficient to keep. 86.44.31.213 (talk) 00:31, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: The substantial majority of edits by 86.44.31.213 are arguments for "keep" in AfDs, sometimes continuing at length, and sometimes in cases with no "keep" support from anyone else at all. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:44, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * i took the trouble to deal with this strange smear here. 86.44.47.170 (talk) 21:57, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The problem being that your claims don't match the links. The links in the article (and yours) don't pass criteria by themselves.  Being named "indie label of the week" is the only claim of notability, and generated a single line, one line, of text in the article linked.  The "two" references from BBC are actually the same article.  Dennis Brown (talk) 22:22, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You should have a clue what you're talking about before a charge like "your claims don't match the links". I'll leave it at that. 86.44.31.213 (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I can confirm that what Dennis Brown says is exactly true. There is just one reference to one BBC page, though the reference is repeated so that it looks like two references, and that reference has just a one line mention of Jezus Factory (not even a full sentence). JamesBWatson (talk) 12:44, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Amazing. 86.44.31.213 (talk) 13:59, 13 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, causa sui (talk) 20:53, 10 January 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete No evidence of notability. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:44, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable and failing WP:NMUSIC. Reading through, there's not a specific mention for labels but one gets the spirit of notability for music. No one is disputing the existence of this label but it is not cited in reliable sources as being influential in style, technique, repertory or teaching in a particular music genre. --Ifnord (talk) 01:22, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.