Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jha Jha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Keeper   76  22:35, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Jha Jha

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Her 3.8 GPA aside, I don't believe this artist meets WP:MUSIC despite her loose affiliation with Dipset. JBsupreme (talk) 00:06, 12 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:37, 12 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Central member of highly notable group. Nominator has not done enough research; a two-second Google search would clearly indicate at least a base level of importance and surely contains some decent sources that could be used. Glass  Cobra  05:46, 12 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment - if http://www.sixshot.com is a reliable source then it has more than enough sourcing to establish notability. Many substantial mentions in this rap-oriented magazine.  - Wikidemon (talk) 08:14, 12 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Mentioned in a several magazine articles. This is enough to establish notability. Apart from several on sixshot, she is also mentioned here and here lk (talk) 15:56, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - meets notability guidelines for musicians --T-rex 18:29, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete no WP:RS beside her website. We66er (talk) 19:35, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:17, 13 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.