Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jhiljhile City


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn. (non-admin closure) &mdash; Music1201  talk  00:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Jhiljhile City
❌ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nepali keto62 (talk • contribs) 03:51, 18 July 2016‎ (UTC)
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsource,article created by blocked user,citiation isn't available in google  Tiger Gang  Talk    12:41, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note that has been blocked for sockpuppetry - see Sockpuppet investigations/Sarojupreti. Cordless Larry (talk) 15:23, 20 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 July 15.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 13:00, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:58, 15 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep it is about a small city in Nepal where citations are not easily available. Citations provided there can be great proof that it exits. Nepali keto62  Questions?!?!?  01:00, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment by sockpuppet struck - see Sockpuppet investigations/Sarojupreti. Cordless Larry (talk) 15:23, 20 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment - it seems unlikely that this is a city, otherwise better sources could be found. OpenStreetMap just points me to a forest, this source also suggests it is a forest, though there are other mentions of a settlement in books. Does this satisfy WP:NPLACE? I'm not sure. We could do with someone looking for sources in Nepali. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:23, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Update: the place exists. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:26, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment If you want then delete this page and I will create the new page with sources and citations.Thanks— Nepali keto62  Questions?!?!?  07:21, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * That's not really how Wikipedia works, . If you have sources, then please add them to the article and a case can be made for keeping it. That's much simpler than having the article deleted, only to start it again. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:49, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Then remove this article from discussion. This is about real place. You can view more in google too.Thanks— Nepali keto62  Questions?!?!?   08:00, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm curious to know why you're so desperate to remove this article from deletion discussion. You can edit the article freely and if you want to save the article, then please add sources. You cannot remove this article from article for deletion discussion, it can only be closed by an admin depending on the consensus formed through this discussion. Ayub 407 talk 08:25, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * There's nothing stopping you from editing the article while this discussion is taking place, . In fact, improving the sourcing of the article is the best way to demonstrate that it should be kept. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:32, 19 July 2016 (UTC)


 * I don't want this article to be removed because presently leaving near this city. Just 5 miles away.Thanks— Nepali keto62  Questions?!?!?  09:08, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Created and nominated for deletion by the same blocked user. This is just a waste of time. There's enough edits by other users that this probably doesn't qualify for WP:G5, but at this point, we should just delete it and stop wasting everyone's time. No prejudice against someone else recreating this with sources. Consider it WP:TNT, basically. ~ Rob 13 Talk 17:50, 20 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.