Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jhimma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus notability is met Nosebagbear (talk) 14:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Jhimma

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

It is a normal film which has nothing for notability of the subject. References given in the article doesn't show significant coverage. &#9734;&#9733; Sanjeev Kumar   ( talk ) 04:21, 11 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Retain
 * Comment: The film complies notability guidelines given in WP:NFILM. The pageviews for this article since its creation is: 98,813. In my opinion the article should be retained. Rickyurs (talk) 10:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Shellwood (talk) 07:27, 11 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep satisfied WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  12:13, 11 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep fulfills GNG, nothing wrong with it being a "normal film" — PerfectSoundWhatever  (t; c) 01:45, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: Meets NFILM with 2+ cited reliable reviews. More reviews may be available in Marathi language and/or offline -- Ab207 (talk) 16:37, 13 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.