Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jiacam

Jiacam was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was

(Jiacam) Significant portions of www.jiacam.org are still under construction a month after the journal's projected launch date. Also, the current article appears to be an advertisement. If and when the journal becomes notable, an article about it can be created anew. &mdash;Triskaideka 21:50, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * delete, but allow to be recreated if it is launched, and everything goes okay. Dunc_Harris|&#9786; 22:02, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: there is no article here, just a link with a sentence or two saying what the link is to. An article would look different, even if the journal were up and running. Geogre 00:39, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Advert. Wikipedia is not a web guide.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 02:00, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a web directory, especially for sites that aren't finished. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 05:47, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)