Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jiggles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snow keep. (non-admin closure) Esquivalience  t 01:24, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Jiggles

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is nothing of note here for a worldwide encyclopedia. overage is basically limited to local press about the efforts to get rid of this establishment. I bet the locals have even forgotten about this topic already. Legacypac (talk) 08:25, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions.   Musa Talk  ☻ 09:33, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.   Musa Talk  ☻ 09:33, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. The nominator is wrong. There are multiple sources from across the US. Meets GNG. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:46, 3 February 2016 (UTC)


 * KEEP and speedy close. GNG is clearly met in this case -- even if coverage is basically limited to local press (which is not the case, as a cursory search reveals.) Be careful to note that this is not a case of NOTNEWS, but that Jiggles' existing notability was made greater following the death and the demolishing. Its very being a noteworthy establishment in Oregon for thirty years is of note. Yes, more could be done to shift the attention away from the recent news and things such as its history could be beefed up, and prettify the game slightly, but that is definitely not grounds for deletion. Kingoflettuce (talk) 14:55, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per GNG. There are plenty of sources discussing the history of this establishment. In addition to the sources already incorporated into the article, there are more posted on the talk page and more to be found. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:42, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * It is a now demolished single location strip club in Tualatin, Oregon population 26,000... seriously? How does it meet WP:CORPDEPTH? I only found it because this article is camped over an English word that came up in RfD.  Legacypac (talk) 00:34, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Oregon strip clubs can be notable: Mary's Club,  Three Sisters Tavern. I realize pointing to other articles does not help establish notability, but I think the Jiggles article could be expanded to similar quality.  Another Believer  ( Talk ) 04:50, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * See also WP:DEFUNCTS and WP:NTEMP. North America1000 21:27, 4 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep due to widespread coverage including Hawaii, UK, ABC news, Oregon Supreme Court, and a dictionary(?). —EncMstr (talk) 07:34, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep – There's plenty of note here for Wikipedia, because the topic passes WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG. Note that per WP:NEXIST, "notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article". North America1000 21:23, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep – There is no requirement for world-wide notability (if there was, Wikipedia would be trimmed to only a few thousand articles), and the coverage passes GNG. WP:CORPDEPTH really only means you need more sources, not to mention the articles are not exactly all trivial. Plus, per WP:BEFORE did the nominator search for sources? That is required before listing at AfD. Aboutmovies (talk) 06:35, 5 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.