Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jigyasa Singh (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Tons of sources on Google not to mention those below, Obvious Keep (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 19:43, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Jigyasa Singh
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable actress. Article is unreferenced. Musa Talk ☻ 15:01, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   Musa Talk  ☻ 15:02, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.   Musa Talk  ☻ 15:02, 19 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep per the following sources:, , as well as the many in-depth to be found about this subject. However, the article needs a lot of clean-up, and the phrase "Cute and young Jigyasa is a new comer in Indian Television who managed to grab various hearts within a very short span of her career." appears to be a copyvio. But otherwise, this article should not be deleted by any means. edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī 02:30, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree with what EditorE said. Inter&#38;anthro (talk) 14:29, 21 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment The article is unreferenced and the information about the person in the article can be incorrect so It should be deleted. Also see Ignore all rules--   Musa Talk  ☻ 12:11, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Where in the bloody nine regions of hell have you been playing at? The Ignore all rules card I think you trying to play here does not work. Yes, this article is unreferenced and the unsourced information could be false, but given the reliable sources that I've shown, that is no reason for deleting an article. Articles for deletion is mean for discussion on whether articles should be kept based on its notability. It's not meant for use as a clean-up tag. edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī 22:16, 22 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.