Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jill Bell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:05, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Jill Bell

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Seems like an industry professional but has no secondary sources to substantiate notability so I don't think this passes WP:GNG. I am also not familiar with typography so I can't determine WP:CREATIVE. BriefEdits (talk) 17:17, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. BriefEdits (talk) 17:17, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. BriefEdits (talk) 17:17, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. BriefEdits (talk) 17:17, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:22, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Most the citations are dead and I can't revive them or anything similar. The most I can find is the 2 paragraphs on fonts.com and an interview that features her work. There is also what appears to be a self-published book . I did see her biography on various pages (like) but there was nothing to show that these were not submitted by her (e.g. for conferences and meetings). I have no doubt that she is a lettering professional, but I can't establish notability with what I found. Lamona (talk) 03:02, 17 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.