Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jill Chamberlain


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:48, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Jill Chamberlain

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Concerns about subject notability. Article is largely promotional. Sources are problematic. Ditch &#8733; 02:25, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete When a subject's top published work is a red link, that's probably a sign they don't pass WP:AUTHOR. As nom stated, refs are not great either, many seem self-promotional. South Nashua (talk) 03:49, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:53, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:53, 15 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - no in-depth significant coverage independent of subject. Neutralitytalk 16:59, 15 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.