Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jill Fraser (UK politician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I personally think we should include people in this position, but clear consensus has been consistently otherwise.  DGG ( talk ) 04:39, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Jill Fraser (UK politician)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Municipal politician not inherently notable just for being in politics, who is not notable just for being the first Liberal Democrat Mayor of Camden. She is also not notable by way of simply being a Camden borough councillor, also standing for election and being a losing candidate for a general election does not confer notability. Taken together these do not make her a notable individual as none of the individual events are notable and nor is the sum of the events. Sport and politics (talk) 02:27, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 22:16, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 22:16, 22 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Local councillor, non-executive mayor and parliamentary candidate. Not enough for notability. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
 * While we accept members of the main citywide London Assembly as notable under WP:NPOL, we do not extend that to the borough councillors — and the borough mayor is a non-executive position which rotates annually among the councillors rather than being directly elected. While a person in those types of political roles can still get into Wikipedia if the volume of sourcing is solid enough to invoke WP:GNG, nothing here gives her an automatic inclusion freebie just because she exists. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 17:00, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - above editors provided excellent analysis of why this person doesn't meet WP:NPOL.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:59, 29 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.