Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jill Rubery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Keep to Strong Keep to Snow Keep. Early close. Shambolic Afd rationale. No need to keep it open to waste further time. (non-admin closure)  scope_creep Talk  12:12, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Jill Rubery

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

She has won no awards nor done anything of notice beyond what is expected of a working scholar. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 03:38, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Sigh. She's an elected fellow of the British Academy - "Election as a Fellow of the British Academy recognises high scholarly distinction". That satisfies WP:NPROF criteria 3. Please learn from this, BeenAroundAWhile. The fellowship - an award which you did not spot - was sentence three of the article. This AfD listing is either out of ignorance or malice. I hope the first, but you MUST understand WP:NPROF and what constitutes an award if you are to avoid making regrattable mistakes like this again. --Tagishsimon (talk) 04:00, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  J  947 &thinsp;(c) , at 04:28, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  J  947 &thinsp;(c) , at 04:28, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  J  947 &thinsp;(c) , at 04:28, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions.  J  947 &thinsp;(c) , at 04:29, 2 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep as passes WP:NPROF and also easily passes WP:NPROF, having an h-index of 68. I advise the nominator to take a look at other AfDs on academics as they are a specialised area of AfD that can be hard to understand.  J 947 &thinsp;(c) , at 04:33, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - Fellow of the British Academy. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 04:38, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Clear pass of WP:Prof. It is hard to understand this AfD nomination. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:09, 2 December 2019 (UTC).
 * Keep per WP:PROF C1 and C3 and WP:AUTHOR (searching JSTOR for her name finds many reviews of her books) and give BeenAroundAWhile some side-eye for nominating three highly-notable female academics for deletion in quick succession. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:11, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep: Seriously twice? A Fellow of the Academy?  This string of shambolic nominations, from a veteran editor with tens of thousands of edits, blows holes through WP:BEFORE and is verging on bad faith.  I strongly advise the nom to cease them at once before matters escalate to ANI.   Ravenswing      07:33, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Snow Keep . I advise you stop to examine your actions carefully.  scope_creep Talk  12:09, 2 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.