Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jill Sayre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 16:26, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Jill Sayre

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

A short biography which devotes most of its space to the subject's self-published novel. Fails WP:BIO. Victoriagirl 01:40, 3 June 2007 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related page because as it fails to meet WP:BIO. Both are the creation of Dchi7, a single purpose account.:
 * Delete per WP:BIO Lipsticked Pig


 * Delete per WP:BK Not a reflection on the quality of the work, which appears to have been received well by those who read it. Lipsticked Pig 02:46, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * - {View Afd} (View log)

This article needs some touching up. However, I think that information needs to be added to it; but that it be deleted? True; what's there now is a pathetic excuse for such a strong, wonderful writer, but if some people improve the article, it won't have to be deleted. Understand? Meldshal42 11:36, 3 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment As stated above, both nominations are based on the arguement that the subjects fail WP:N - in particular, Jill Sayre fails WP:BIO, while The Waiting Womb fails WP:BK. Poor quality has nothing to do with either nomination. Victoriagirl 16:19, 3 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete, per above. Bad ideas 00:27, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete both per reasons cited in my nomination. Victoriagirl 01:42, 5 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.