Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jill Tuck-Kramer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 08:11, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Jill Tuck-Kramer

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fancruft. Not enough coverage in multiple reliable sources. Defender of torch (talk) 09:48, 8 January 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ged  UK  15:20, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect: I say it can be re-written to avoid an in-universe style and gather more sources/interviews. If not then redirect to List of Saw characters. I see you're going to have a long road of AfD's in your future. ;-) —  Mike   Allen   20:22, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect:Yeah I can agree theres nothing here that cant be easily put on the characters page. However, her place as a major character in the series and the info that could be added does warrant an article of her own. The article should be redirected to the characters page and have a user subpage working on a full article on par with the other character pages which can be published as soon as it has more info and multiple reliable sources. Ground  Z3R0   002  01:25, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * keep as it has suficient content & an external references  Since the work itself is a RS for most of the information, it has sufficient RSs--and the insufficiency of them was the only reason given for deletion. Alternatively, merge adequately including the illustration to the  list of characters;  one brief paragraph is not adequate, seeing that she is a recurring character who appears in  most of the series--the illustration is essential as the character can not be understood in a video without knowing their external appearance. The existing article (or the merged sub-article)   does  needs some editing, as it contains unsourced opinion,  but it should be possible to find sources for most of  it.  IUt ultimately makes very little difference if merged or kept as long as the content is adequate. The best way to ensure this in the current Wikipedia is to keep separate articles.     DGG ( talk ) 00:45, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.