Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Alger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:02, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Jim Alger
Article doesn't establish notability. Dismas|(talk) 08:49, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and send to WP:BJAODN. If he gets elected to the State Assembly, he'll become notable. &mdash;Wh o  uk (talk) 09:09, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator and User:Whouk, also the "suggested edits" make the article unreadable. The user who made them should just have been WP:BOLD and made those edits instead of suggesting them. J I P  | Talk 09:16, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity article. Hell, it was created by ! Also, as his friend Nate (aka ) suggests on the talk page, Jim Alger is just your average Tom, Dick, or or Harry. The Minist   e   r of War   (Peace) 10:03, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * BJAODN made me laugh any way. -- E ivindt@c 12:49, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Pure vanity article. The spelling reminders were good for a laugh though.--Cini 13:41, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete ...Mistress? Er? Danny Lilithborne 19:34, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete quickly --Ajdz 04:48, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Funny as hell, though.  ergot 19:36, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. ≈ jossi ≈ t &bull; @ 21:55, 28 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.