Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Bailey (Stuntman)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:10, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Jim Bailey (Stuntman)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

There is footage of this incident on Youtube, but I'm not convinced being a fatally incompetent stuntman is noteworthy enough for a dedicated article. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 09:33, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as Wikipedia is not a memorial site. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  13:33, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. If sole criterion for notability is this single terminal event, shouldn't be in Wikipedia. --Quartermaster (talk) 13:34, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete The subject is not deserving of a biographical article, although the circumstance of his death could probably be cited in the Wikipedia article listing notable unusual deaths. Regent of the Seatopians (talk) 01:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a memorial. Edward321 (talk) 14:06, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.