Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Carroll (author)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  16:34, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Jim Carroll (author)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nothing in article or online that amounts to independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - fails WP:GNG. Edwardx (talk) 09:41, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:44, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:44, 12 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. This is written advertorially, reading more like the kind of "staff" profile a person would have on the self-published website of their own employer than like an encyclopedia article — and the referencing depends entirely on primary sources that cannot support or carry notability, with zero evidence of any proper reliable source coverage about him in real media being shown at all. As always, Wikipedia is WP:NOTLINKEDIN. Bearcat (talk) 16:08, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:PROMO created and edited by a series of IP, SPA accounts, but containing no claim to notability and no solid sources, none at all. E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:08, 17 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.