Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Chapman (Canadian)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:37, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Jim Chapman (Canadian)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable individual lacking GHIts and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC.  ttonyb (talk) 01:03, 21 October 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete A lot of information listed on the page, but does not seem to be a notable personality who might be known to the general public. Housewatcher (talk) 02:09, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete well, it certainly claims notability, no doubt about that. Doesn't seem to hold up to scrutiny though.  For example, neither of his "bestselling" books are available on either Amazon.com or Amazon.ca.  And I don't just mean they're not in print or not in stock, they're not even search results. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  02:37, 28 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete do not pass go, do not collect $200. All of the sources cited either fail 'trivial mentions' or WP:SPS Ohconfucius  ¡digame! 15:11, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.