Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Cirillo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 20:19, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Jim Cirillo

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced non-notable, no real claim except a book & couple of videos Nate1481(t/c) 14:00, 11 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of martial arts-related deletions.  -- Nate1481(t/c) 14:01, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not really noteable at least the way the article is written. Its an obiturary.Peter Rehse 16:29, 13 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete non notable on WP standards Neozoon 23:18, 13 October 2007 (UTC)


 * This man deserves to have his obit expanded to include better information. As part of the NYPD Stakeout squad he not only was involved in 17 gunfights, he killed several felons.  He has more documented experience in gunfights than most "legendary" old west gunfighters.  When I need to know about someone, I go to Wikipedia......I wanted to know how many armed robbers Cirillo killed during his time with NYPD; I bet I am not the last person to look for this information  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.49.51.180 (talk) 00:28, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Can you provide sources such as newspaper articles for any of this? If so it would cause a rethink otherwise is unverifiable so no use--Nate1481(t/c) 09:42, 16 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete no verification of notability, fails to meet the standards of WP:N Van Tucky  Talk 22:49, 16 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I, too, was curious why the article was deleted. A major biography on Cirillo is in the works and should be available by the spring of 2008. Maybe it can serve as an appropriate source for a future article. User:Jsf67


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.