Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Coughlan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:22, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Jim Coughlan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails to meet Notability (people) standards. A county comptroller is not an automatically notable position, and I see no indication that he has any other claim to notability. There is no page for his position to redirect to. The Dutchess County article doesn't mention the office of comptroller either. Grayfell (talk) 08:04, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:02, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:02, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 7 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Being a county functionary of this sort is not enough to establish notability, and he doesn't seem to have any other claim of significance. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:26, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 03:29, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Keep Meets WP:GNG. Has substantial coverage in multiple sources. It doesn't matter how small the position, if it meets WP:GNG, it's enough. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 03:58, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:GNG. Pburka (talk) 20:18, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.