Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Denney (ski jumper born 1983)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn. Avilich (talk) 02:27, 11 December 2022 (UTC) (non-admin closure)

Jim Denney (ski jumper born 1983)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable olympian. Has a passing mention here (if the same person) but no significant coverage found. Avilich (talk) 21:29, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Olympics. Avilich (talk) 21:29, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes GNG with multiple pieces of SIGCOV, see the following: Denny gets gold, not green from the Leader Telegram; 'To be like a bird for just a little bit' from The Miami Herald; Sky high no longer from the Star Tribune; and Following Dad's lead from the Leader-Telegram. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:53, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:15, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - Sources mentioned above constitute significant coverage. At least a dozen solid paragraphs all up covering this individual. Meets the general notability guideline easily as the sources are reliable. Just because it's a one line stub (and I personally think editors should try to expand to a solid paragraph before publishing) does not mean its ripe for deletion MaxnaCarta (talk) 23:51, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
 * @Avilich I have now included two examples of significant coverage which demonstrate a meeting of the general notability guideline - hoping you please will consider an early close. Cheers MaxnaCarta (talk) 00:01, 11 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.