Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Goetz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep all. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 10:06, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Jim Goetz

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article fails WP:BIO, WP:NOT, WP:SPAM and WP:COI. Article was created by an advertising-only account ( Marketing Executive / SEO at Sequoia Capital with no other edits other than to seed wikipedia with numerous Sequoia Capital vanity Bios, and promote her company. I am also nominating the following vanity pages, Part of this spam campaign:

Wikipedia is NOT a "vehicle for advertising". Hu12 (talk) 17:41, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:26, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep I was going to just comment that COI is ad hominem and that the rules that form its only valid basis be applied instead, but it turns out this nomination is itself proof of that. Just assuming that there is no basis for the article, simply because the writer has a COI, is a false assumption. The New York Times covers Sequoia Capital and Jim Goetz. You just have to search for "Jim Goetz" plus "Sequoia Capital" Anarchangel (talk) 18:00, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep COI != summary grounds for removal of a notable topic.  What is called for is depuffing. Collect (talk) 12:51, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep and rewrite, per Collect. –SJ + 19:11, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.