Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Gotts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Fenix down (talk) 22:46, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Jim Gotts

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NFOOTY due to playing in an era before the English Football League was "fully professional". More importantly fails WP:GNG due to complete lack of WP:SIGCOV. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:13, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:13, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:13, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:13, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:23, 24 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep - playing in the Football League confers notability per WP:NFOOTBALL. Article needs improving, not deleting. GiantSnowman 16:21, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Played in FA cup games a couple of league games, a few sources online, probably more offline sources out there. I feel this isn't a delete. Govvy (talk) 16:28, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per my comments at Austin Dunne above. No Great Shaker (talk) 19:53, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've expanded it a bit. There's enough coverage of his early career, before it was wrecked by injury and the war, to suggest a GNG pass. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 08:35, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep passes NFOOTY.--Ortizesp (talk) 14:48, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:NFOOTY and the article is well-written for the most part. Paul Vaurie (talk) 23:02, 27 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.