Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Grover (martial arts)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 02:40, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Jim Grover (martial arts)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I'd like the community's input on whether or not this person is notable enough for an article. As it stands, the article is not very suitable for Wikipedia, and I'm a little concerned that the subject may not be notable enough at all. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 22:22, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep The article is a shambles, but there are a few nuggets of information plus the CNN coverage that would warrant a stub on this subject. Some very severe editing is needed here. Regent of the Seatopians (talk) 23:17, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Conditional keep: if somebody takes the time to clean this up and change it from a resume into an actual encyclopedic article... I think notability is there, but the current condition is just not up to standards.  bahamut0013  words deeds 12:33, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Article clearly needs work, but I believe there's enough there to show notability. Papaursa (talk) 21:29, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I would like to try and take over this page. I may need some time to bring it up to spec so please bear with me. User:5thprofession47 —Preceding undated comment added 19:34, 23 September 2010 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.