Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Hazel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:13, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Jim Hazel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unremarkable, if successful, businessman. All references are run of the mill mentions for such a person. Barring the self-published. TheLongTone (talk) 15:31, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

I've expanded the article and added some newspaper reference to strengthen a case for notability of this subject. --Danimations (talk) 05:16, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:33, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Pure and unadulterated promotion (like much of the writers output). duffbeerforme (talk) 13:03, 3 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.