Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Jordan (photographer & director)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:12, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Jim Jordan (photographer & director)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

References are provided which establish some notability but I'm not sure they're enough, and there seem to be WP:COI issues in play. Barney the barney barney (talk) 18:16, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete under WP:CSD. I would have tagged it for speedy promo if you hadn't already tagged for AfD. I may be wrong, but I also think that the ampersand should not be in the title. &mdash;  kikichugirl  inquire 18:26, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Jim Jordan, American photographer and director has already been speedy deleted today! Though Jordan likes to blow his trumpet online, I can't see any evidence he's been picked up by reliable news sources. Sionk (talk) 20:02, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:51, 29 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Listed references are insufficient to establish notability, which requires independent reliable sources. The author, Jjfoto1, makes it quite clear right in the article that he is the subject of the article and has promotional intent. He also attempted to write an article about his agency White Cross Inc. which has been speedied. Perhaps he should be counseled? --MelanieN (talk) 19:58, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.