Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Lockey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:42, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Jim Lockey

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete. Non-notable artist with no significant coverage from reliable sources. Author's only contribution and author may also be the subject. Already deleted once via WP:PROD (old version was also that author's only contribution). Nothing found in Google search to establish notability. Wknight94 talk  01:38, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree. Rafablu88  02:03, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. Appears to be slightly promotional. Netalarm   talk  02:09, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - I added the notability tag giving the benefit of the doubt, but no changes have been made to address notability. Clubmarx (talk) 02:18, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Nominator is correct, except there is no coverage, let alone significant coverage, from independant sources. Edward321 (talk) 14:12, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.