Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim McKenzie (ice hockey, born 1984)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:03, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Jim McKenzie (ice hockey, born 1984)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 03:58, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:25, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:25, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:25, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:26, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment - I believe this satisfied WP:NHOCKEY back in 2008. Definitely does not pass today. I'm not sure about GNG. It may pass that. I'll do a bit of digging. Alaney2k (talk) 14:49, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Jupitus Smart  17:28, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment - Doesn't meet NHOCKEY, but is close enough I don't consider that sufficient reason for deletion. Power~enwiki (talk) 23:05, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - He's about a season and a half worth of AHL games away from meeting NHOCKEY's games played minimum. That's not close. --Parkfly20 (talk) 15:09, 10 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.