Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim P. Slaton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was weak keep.  Cbrown1023   talk   18:30, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Jim P. Slaton

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Failed recent CSD, I was advised by the declining editor to list it here to see if I could establish consensus for deletion. The article does not appear to assert notability and is badly written (although the latter is not actually a deletion criterion). George D. Watson  (Dendodge). Talk Help 08:26, 15 April 2008 (UTC) 
 * Weak keep, he actually does have GNA coverage, but the article is in terrible shape. --Dhartung | Talk 09:20, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:45, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Can someone edit the Jim P. Slaton article for the editor? How does this article get fixed so it doesn't get deleted? I know Jim Slaton and he is an amazing dude! Let me know... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.31.107.45 (talk)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 19:55, 21 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak keep so it can  get improved. He apparently has won enough prizes and been the subject of enough work to be notable. DGG (talk) 21:38, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, needs urgent cleanup, but there appears to be enough material in GNA as above to construct a decent article out of it. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:26, 27 April 2008 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.