Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Pooley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Brentford Trilogy. (non-admin closure) SST  flyer  03:14, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Jim Pooley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There doesn't appear to be anything to properly establish notability for this character. Even if there are references, they would be better used on the main series article. TTN (talk) 20:46, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 20:46, 20 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete and making the name a redirect to book series article, The Brentford Trilogy. This is uncited and not-notable for a stand alone article. Material could be transferred but it's totally uncited and since Wikipedia cannot cite to itself, it would be better for one to make any additions with RS cites to the book article. Kierzek (talk) 21:58, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect without deletion, to The Brentford Trilogy. Above commentator's advice violates WP:CWW, and a redirect without deletion is a simple way to allow non-admins to merge previously contributed non-notable content if so desired. Jclemens (talk) 01:53, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm not convinced of the value of the redirect, and I'm seeing little worth merging, especially given what a weak article The Brentford Trilogy is. Sorry. Josh Milburn (talk) 21:08, 22 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.