Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Poulette


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 08:14, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Jim Poulette

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No evidence of notability. The article was largely written by the subject himself, who removed WP:PROD, WP:COI and WP:ADVERT tags, calling them "BS". His claims to fame are (1) a book with no evidence of notability, (2) a patent with no evidence of notability, (3) some articles, photographs, letters, with no evidence of notability. Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 15:29, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 03:29, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment No "claim to fame" is claimed. If you want "notability, please write your own book. Stop trying to get attention by spreding graphitti all over my pages. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.237.78.40 (talk) 11:53, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia articles are not owned by any individual. See WP:OWN. Also, do not remove the AFD notice from the article again; that is a decision for an administrator at the end of this debate. Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 12:43, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * delete as per nom. Google turns up nothing notable on the book, and the other material is very slight. Bar an obscure patent the references say nothing about the article subject. JohnBlackburne (talk) 14:24, 25 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as above. The book is the only serious claim to notability and the Ghits on it are very slight. Mangoe (talk) 14:29, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.