Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Rowlands


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:11, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Jim Rowlands

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Article is about a Welsh folk musician that does not have coverage in reliable sources. He has been played on the radio (see ) but that is a single show and not regular rotation play. Aside from that, I can find no articles written about him. Whpq (talk) 17:42, 22 September 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:31, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. It is a BLP and the two sources provided are both primary and quite weak.  I've tried a google search and nothing is leaping to attention.  If no stronger sources are provided that can verify the subject matter I err on the side of delete. --  role player 20:09, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HEY - I found a few good sources, some in English, some French and some Welsh. My French is rusty and my Welsh is dependent on Google Translater.  Rowlands has toured Britain and France extensively, and his music has been on two BBC stations and a documentary.  I think he passes WP:MUSIC. Bearian (talk) 23:54, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.