Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Smith (recording engineer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 03:41, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Jim Smith (recording engineer)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not assert notability, unable to find any notability online RaseaC (talk) 15:57, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:24, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Apart from the lack of anything in the article to suggest notability, I have made extensive web searches, and have found nothing more than a few credits to him as engineer on records and similar brief mentions, and few even of those. No other Wikipedia article mentions him either. He really does not seem to be notable in Wikipedia's sense. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:53, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. Clearly the number of users who have expressed an opinion here is very small, but among those who have commented there is consensus. Nobody at all has provided any indication whatsoever of notability, either in the article itself or here, and two users have searched and failed to find any such indication. In at least one case the searches for indications for notability have been quite extensive and prolonged. Conclusion: he is not notable. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:53, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:37, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete These things shouldn't keep being relisted. If they don't have sources to show notability and nobody pipes up in a week to fix it, then we can get rid of it - without prejudice to recreation in the future. Miami33139 (talk) 03:47, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a directory of every person with a job. No evidence has been presented that the article satisfies WP:BIO. Edison (talk) 05:29, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Yeah, really, let's stop arsing around and delete it already. RaseaC (talk) 14:28, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.