Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Stime


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:02, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Jim Stime

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails to meet notability guidelines at WP:BIO. His highest viewing figures for a video on youtube are in the 30,000 range, and google search reveals no great notability for his work in aquaria. Stu.W UK (talk) 23:30, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I support Deletion. The article doesn't sight his notability, all the references are to his own websites and projects. As Stu says, he doesn't even have all that many YouTube views. Pi        (Talk to me!  ) 03:00, 19 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - No signficant coverage about him in reliable sources. He was quoted in this article but that does not establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 14:06, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.