Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Szwiec

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 07:10, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Jim Szwiec
Vanity. – flamurai (t) 11:08, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete vanity. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 15:07, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, Vanity. Inter 15:33, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, ditto. – Kpalion (talk) 16:34, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, vanity. Rje 17:44, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, user test. Wyss 18:59, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedian231 19:03, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, article does not establish notability, possible vanity. Megan1967 05:57, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete this article on this non-notable person. The only thing that comes to my mind is "So what?" and "Who cares?" Zzyzx11 08:10, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Enochlau 12:15, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)