Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Thomas (executive)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗ plicit  23:41, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Jim Thomas (executive)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Contested PROD. Rationale was: no evidence of notability, and the article cites clearly inadequate sources (one profile page, not even a "profile" article, just a bunch of stats). Just a WP:RESUME. User:FieldMarine added some references but they still are not substantial third-party coverage of the dude himself and they don't add up to notability under WP:ANYBIO. WP:BEFORE doesn't come up with anything more substantial either. FalconK (talk) 17:34, 11 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:45, 18 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:55, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 17:34, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep - I was rolling my eyes until the very end of the piece. The awards and their published sourcing sneak this one over GNG, I feel. Carrite (talk) 19:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - notable enough. Bearian (talk) 14:49, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - I agree that it is notable enough to keep. Craigwikiman (talk) 15:53, 1 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.