Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Wright (footballer, born 1910)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. all relevant notability guidelines met, particularly WP:NFOOTY. (non-admin closure) Exemplo347 (talk) 00:10, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Jim Wright (footballer, born 1910)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Doesn't meet WP:NFOOTBALL and doesn't have significant coverage needed for WP:GNG  Jolly  Ω   Janner  18:20, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * He certainly does meet WP:Footy, having played in the Football League for Torquay United, Grimsby Town, Sheffield Wednesday and Swansea Town. If you have access to newspaper sources from the 1930s I'm sure you'll find coverage there.--EchetusXe 18:55, 13 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep Really don't get this nomination. He's played in the top division for two clubs (Grimsby & Sheffield Wednesday) and in the Football League for two others (Torquay & Swansea). It's painfully obvious that he meets WP:NFOOTY. Number   5  7  11:23, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Nfitz (talk) 16:31, 14 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep Is it April 1 already? Clearly meets WP:NFOOTBALL. Nfitz (talk) 16:31, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - made over 60 appearances in the Football League, so passes WP:NFOOTBALL comfortably. Kosack (talk) 16:37, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep as noted above, meets NFOOTBALL. Lepricavark (talk) 23:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.