Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimbobbing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  01:29, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Jimbobbing

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable term.No hits on Google. Wikipedia is not for things made up one day &raquo; \ / (⁂) 04:11, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yep, and Wikipedia is not a dictionary either. Seems to be a self-coined neologism for what everyone else calls egocentrism, and the article is itself living proof of it (cf "a blight of society"). The contrived "etymology" could well qualify it as vandalism. -- Fullstop (talk) 04:31, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as prodder. Self-coined neologism. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 04:41, 7 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. ArcAngel (talk) 08:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete just another attempt to foist a neologism's validity via Wikipedia. JuJube (talk) 09:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Arggh. Neologisms. Fribbler (talk) 17:22, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The article should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. The article is not notable, no significant news coverage upon verification.--Ped Admi (talk) 19:38, 7 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.