Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimena Barón


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, disruptive series of rapid-fire AfDs without any WP:BEFORE attempt. Fram (talk) 11:23, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Jimena Barón

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

She is famous because of relationship with her parthner. Apart from that what is her independet notablity? For now article is quite poorly sourced. Dawid2009 (talk) 16:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Bands and musicians, Women,  and Argentina.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:25, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn by nominator Since Jimena Barón received many significant awards at music industry, it does not augur well for the encyclopedia to have her page plastered with the deletion discussion. Dawid2009 (talk) 09:51, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - Clearly meets WP:MUSICBIO due to several Top 100 charting tracks in various countries. Also she is MTV Europe Music Award winner. I assume the nominator did not notice this? Pershkoviski (talk) 18:28, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - I believe having a platinum record is also one of the criteria for MUSICBIO as well as the awards won and chart success mentioned above. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:05, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Clearly established notability already established and documented in Wikipedia. This nomination (one of dozens today of notable women associated with professional soccer players by the same contributor) feels malicious MNewnham (talk) 01:50, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Agree with all above. The nominator has glanced over dozens of articles on footballers' wives and copy-pasted AfD nominations within time windows of minutes, not doing proper reevaluation of existent nor research of new sources to be added to establish WP:GNG, relying on WP:NOTINHERITED. Selective cleanup + nonadequate pre-AfD conduct + mass AfD-ing that creates a lot of research and improvement work that they expect others to do. Edit: Also per @User:Cavarrone in Articles for deletion/Giorgia Palmas - the closing admin should consider speedy keep of all articles in this series of AfDs for these reasons. –Vipz (talk) 08:43, 13 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.