Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmi Jaiswal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per G11 by Kuru. (non-admin closure) Shellwood (talk) 11:52, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Jimmi Jaiswal

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Following this being speedily deleted User:Kuru, this was quickly recreated, with my CSD tag removed by an IP, but this is flagrantly promotional and IMO requiring G11. The content is also extensively copied needing G12, see Earwig. On notability: Ref 1 is a promotional puff piece (e.g., He is also the most searchable Indian Artist), advertising to Jimmi's external links, being non-SIGCOV. Ref 2 is similarly a non-SIGCOV promotional routine announcement by an unnamed contributor in a questionably reliable source. Ref 3 is interview-like, e.g., On asking about his motivation behind, but on asking, and uses similar promotional wording compared to previous refs. Ref 4 is another blatantly promotional, non-SIGCOV minor news story linking to Social Media Links. Note that ref 3 and 4 use similar language in stating that the artist is verified (?). Then Live Hindu, which is another promotional announcement having little editorial policies to meet WP:NEWSORG. A WP:BEFORE search revealed many routine announcements from this questionable website. Therefore, I purpose a speedy deletion giving the obvious promotion, but given this is contested standard deletion might be necessary.  VickKiang  (talk)  05:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  VickKiang  (talk)  08:52, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry; I usually respect the AFD process and let these play out, but the sporadic copyright vios (snippets of previously published materials) noted make this a mandatory CSD. As for the rest - this is just an obvious very poorly written COI spam piece, supported by known SEO sinks. There's just no need to waste time on it. I've re-deleted under G11 + G12.Sam Kuru (talk) 11:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.