Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmi Saputra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  10:14, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Jimmi Saputra

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Doesn't appear to be a notable entrepreneur, also was deleted in 2020. AmirŞah 23:28, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople,  and Indonesia.  AmirŞah  23:28, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes the WP:GNG, due to he has received significant coverage in multiple RS in English and Indonesian language as a founder and CEO of a cryptocurrency company an other businesses. Mahdiar86 (talk) 00:02, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep, It might that he is a founder and CEO of a non-notable company, but I believe the subject is notable and passes WP:GNG, based on the independent sources covering him significantly. —Natalie  Ricci Natalie 01:13, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. I was going to say keep at first, as there appears to be some coverage of the subject, but looking at some of the sources, it's clear that several of them are paid for or are just press releases: see versus, and this one from The Jakarta Post, marked as an Inforial, "a term used to describe article containing advertisement". Isabelle 🏳‍🌈 19:42, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per citations for his activities in field of cryptocurrency and NFT project in Indonesia including, , , , , ,  and others, has received significant coverage in Indonesian language, however citations in English could be press releasing or not.Nassimela (talk) 05:51, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep I do agree with Nassimella and according to provided sources, he passes Wikipedia general notability guideline, as provided coverage.ZanciD (talk) 00:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep as per others have stated above it it passes WP:GNG and has received significant coverage. Samanthany (talk) 23:41, 20 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.