Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Bubnick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. SarahStierch (talk) 17:29, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Jimmy Bubnick

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable ice hockey player. Canada Hky (talk) 14:49, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me   What did he do now?  15:13, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me   What did he do now?  15:13, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:33, 17 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete: Nothing by way of the GNG outside of WP:ROUTINE and WP:GEOSCOPE violations. The subject hasn't played beyond major junior, and at that level, needs to achieve "preeminent honors" -- to wit, being an all-time top ten career scorer or a First Team All-Star -- to meet the criteria of WP:NHOCKEY.  He hasn't.  At his age, a prerequisite for future notability as a hockey player would be to play in the pros.  He hasn't done that either.   Ravenswing   00:13, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Fails NHOCKEY and GNG. Hwy43 (talk) 08:02, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ravenswing. He pretty much sums it up. Nothing to say he meets NHOCKEY and he fails to meet GNG. -DJSasso (talk) 13:59, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per above and nom.  Patken4 (talk) 22:12, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm actually a little surprised he never went pro, anywhere. Was a good little player for the Hitmen.  He is also nn. Resolute 20:31, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Mostly, per above. — ΛΧΣ  21  Call me Hahc21 02:08, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep – Meets GNG with several independent and significant sources including, and also meets criteria #4 of WP:NHOCKEY to wit, as a member of the 2010 Memorial Cup First All-Star Team. Dolovis (talk) 14:54, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Do you even read the "sources" you post in these discussions? The first one is a blog, thus not a reliable source. The 3rd on is a reprint from hitmenhockey.com thus not independant. And the 4th one isn't even an article, its a database entry. And criteria #4 is for a season First All-Star, not an individual tournament. -DJSasso (talk) 15:33, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
 * It's a crying shame that the disconnect between what policies, guidelines and the consensus thereof actually hold, and what Dolovis wants them to state, is so profound. His disagreement with them is tolerable (heck, there's at least one contentious issue on which I agree with him against consensus); his routine and willful defiance of them is not.   Ravenswing   09:08, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.