Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Kunes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedily deleted (G12) by Sphilbrick. Non-admin closure. Deor (talk) 23:13, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Jimmy Kunes

 * – ( View AfD View log )

non notable musician Wuh  Wuz  Dat  18:58, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - At first glance, subject does not appear notable. NickCT (talk) 19:18, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 *  Keep  With all due respect, we should look deeper than a "first glance". WP:MUSICBIO states that a musician is notable if a member of 2 or more notable ensembles.  Jimmy Kunes was a member of both Savoy Brown and Cactus (band).  Both are notable and Savoy Brown in particular was a mainstay of late 60s hard rock.  All that being said, the article is a shambles and needs quite a bit of work.  I'll get to work on it. Cullen328 (talk) 20:45, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I withdraw my "Keep" based on the discovery of copyvio by Phil Bridger. Cullen328 (talk) 21:57, 6 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep, clean up, and add more sources. Krashlandon (talk) 21:40, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Cirt (talk) 22:14, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete looks like hoax Someone65 (talk) 17:00, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as a copyright violation of the myspace page referenced in the article. If I had been able to find any evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources, or that his membership of those notable bands was anything more than the sad attempts that we see by groups of aging session musicians to claim that they are continuations of notable bands from the 60s and 70s, I would have rewritten this to avoid copyright violation. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:34, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.