Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Medranda


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 19:10, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Jimmy Medranda

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Player fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. PROD was denied by User:Elisfkc for the following reason: "Proposed deletion removed as he now is on loan to 1st division US MLS team, Sporting KC". However, that is not a good enough reason to remove the PROD. Medranda still needs to actually play in MLS before he becomes notable, which he has not done yet, and he clearly does not pass GNG. So the reason deletion still stands. ArsenalFan700 (talk) 22:08, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:39, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:39, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:40, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:56, 10 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:51, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - A case of WP:TOOSOON, if he plays then the article can be recreated. Fenix down (talk) 10:46, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails notability guidelines. – Michael (talk) 20:05, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 08:36, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.