Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Panos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:36, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Jimmy Panos

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet criteria WP:NHOCKEY Domdeparis (talk) 10:58, 29 November 2016 (UTC)


 * It does not have to meet the WP:Hockey guidelines. Its a biography on a guy who is still playing on the side. There will be more information to come. This man does a lot of work with charities and such and we wanted to recognize him. Deleting this page would be a mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RyanHartman389 (talk • contribs) 20:05, 29 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Since the article focuses on him as a hockey player, it is appropriate to look at the NHOCKEY guidelines. He doesn't meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG, either. —C.Fred (talk) 20:09, 29 November 2016 (UTC)


 * It does meet WP:BIO his name is in fact mentioned in all of the references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.178.2.1 (talk) 22:02, 29 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment RyanHartman389 please read WP:BIO if he has made some very significant work for charities despite his young age there must be some sources somewhere that prove this. As the article stands there are no WP:CCS.  Please remember that wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not everyone has their place in it.  It's a nice gesture to want to pay hommage to a great guy but to be honest that's what social media is for. --Domdeparis (talk) 20:14, 29 November 2016 (UTC)


 * This article shouldn't be deleted, it's a notable person as RyanHartman389 said. SomeRandomUserGuy (talk) 20:25, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

'''* His name is mentioned in the articles. That meets WP:BIO guidelines. '''
 * Strong delete. Complete fail of WP:NHOCKEY and WP:BIO. This charity work that keeps getting mentioned only amounts to him playing on a team that participated in a charity event. There's no substantial coverage of him in the cited sources about the events: one only mentions him in the list of team members captioning an image, and the other doesn't mention him at all. —C.Fred (talk) 21:10, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * ^ I disagree fully. This article should not be deleted it's only 1 day old and has a lot of notable information regarding this boys life already and is only going to grow. You google this name and dozens of sites show him. Not to mention his social media following that will continue to support the page and add more information to it as time goes on. There's no point. It will keep being brought back and revived. It also clearly states he has done work for various charities in the references.

SomeRandomUserGuy is right. Thos is a notable living person and infact does meet the WP:BIO guidelines. -J. Venino — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1008:B113:8FDD:5D13:CC80:4F54:A9B5 (talk) 22:12, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

This page technically does meet WP:BIO guidelines and should not be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JackNimrod1414 (talk • contribs) 22:17, 29 November 2016 (UTC)


 * I have opened a SPI case, as all of the opposes appear to be the same person, also Strong Delete as non notable. Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  22:27, 29 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Snow Delete Obviously fails WP:NHOCKEY as they have never been a professional hockey player.  No significant coverage in references to pass WP:BIO. Bgwhite (talk) 05:58, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SNOW. Bearian (talk) 19:54, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete does not even come close to meeting the notability guidelines for hockey players.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:34, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment fluff articles on totally non-notable people would ideally not even survive a full hour, it is scary if the article makes it a whole day. I still think we need to tighten the guidelines on who can create articles, too often it is done by single-purpose accounts.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:36, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NHOCKEY. Given the above user's threats to bring the page back regardless of the outcome of this AfD, I also recommend page protection to prevent recreation. Smartyllama (talk) 13:44, 5 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.