Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Wales Foundation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Nomination is plainly incorrect and poorly reasoned, and we have a sowball of unanimous keep votes, so this can just be closed right now. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:49, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Jimmy Wales Foundation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not famous organisation. It is not passing guidelines. Jackfield1122 (talk) 12:46, 8 October 2018 (UTC) — Jackfield1122 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Jackfield1122 (talk) 12:44, 8 October 2018 (UTC) Blocked Sock-- D Big X ray ᗙ  19:00, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep, plenty of major media references. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:51, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per above has coverage from major media outlets.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:59, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2018 October 8.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 13:06, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep since the subject is notable, and has been covered in reliable sources. Thanks, Knightrises10   talk   13:23, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep as has coverage in multiple reliable sources such as The Jerusalem Post and The Huffington Post that are already in the article, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 15:30, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:06, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:06, 8 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. This foundation has got attention from reliable independent sources and thus satisfies WP:ORGIN.Vinodbasker (talk) 16:15, 8 October 2018 (UTC)*


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.