Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jindal Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. has shown there are more than enough sources to indicate this topic is notable. (non-admin closure) Steve Quinn (talk) 03:58, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Jindal Group

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Sources for this topic consists only of routine business announcements (acquisitions, asset sales, funding, investments, etc.), company websites, and materials derived from public relations. No independent reliable sources cover this topic. Fails GNG, CORPDEPTH, and ORGIND. Also, notability is not inherent (ORGSIG) and not inherited (INHERITORG). Article creation was 2009 so it has had plenty of time to demonstrate notability. Steve Quinn (talk) 00:57, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:02, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:02, 14 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - I think that should be deleted as the resources are very much, so many sources are not available in the search engine, to prove that this page can be kept. Warm Regards- ( User:HappyToHelp talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by HappyToHelp (talk • contribs) 19:02, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: The above user first !voted at Nikhil Pahwa AfD & three minutes later they copy-pasted that !vote here. - NitinMlk (talk) 21:16, 14 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment – In 2006 & 2007, the O.P. Jindal group was 6th & 4th respectively among the top business groups of India. In 2016, it slipped to 12th spot, but it is still among the top business groups of the country. As of now, the group's net worth is $7.4 billion & it was $10.9 billion in 2012. A quick search found some sort of sources, e.g., , , , , , , etc. Also, there are many books which discuss them – . And this is for Daily Mail lovers. ;) Jokes aside, it isn't a typical corporate spam & should be examined carefully. - NitinMlk (talk) 21:16, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Clearly notable as a major business group with loads of coverage in reliable book sources. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 10:42, 15 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.