Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jing Shan Primary School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Ang Mo Kio. The Bushranger One ping only 03:41, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Jing Shan Primary School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES although there are quite a few ghits. A redir to a suitable target is an option. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 20:30, 16 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES which chronicles the precedent for such schools, to Ang Mo Kio where it is listed. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:17, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 20:53, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 20:53, 17 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Note The school has received independent coverage here and in Singapore's National Library board newspaper archives (requires Singapore citizenship to log in). Can anybody verify if it is significant enough?--Lionratz (talk) 03:46, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:41, 23 January 2013 (UTC)




 * Keep per the source found by Lionratz above. Benefit of the doubt should be given such that, at some point, an .sg citizen can come around and take a look at that source (I suggest noting it on the article's talkpage). &tilde;danjel [ talk &#124; contribs ] 16:18, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The link does not  provide sufficient  mention  in  depth  and focus to  assert notability  for a stand-alone article. Redirect is the only  available option  here. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:44, 2 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 10:42, 30 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - it lacks significant coverage in independent sources. Bearian (talk) 21:10, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Ang_Mo_Kio per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Does not have WP:SIGCOV to warrant a standalone article. Mkdw talk 01:12, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.