Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jinmyeong Girls' High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per longstanding consensus and precedent Randykitty (talk) 14:46, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Jinmyeong Girls' High School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Orphan, self-cite only, doesn't seem to satisfy WP:ORG. Bit promotional too. &mdash; regards, Revi 08:16, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as lacking in deoth coverage in independent coverage. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:50, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep as a secondary school per longstanding consensus and precedent. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:41, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:41, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:41, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Just because it is secondary school? How can you prove its notability? Which of the school's characteristics can prove its own merit as a article in Wikipedia? It's just another school in the street without having enough noticable coverage from the press. &mdash; regards, Revi 15:27, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * It has long been consensus at AfD that all verified secondary schools are notable. See WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:33, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Ok, so it is completely fine to create articles about all high schools near my city, without actually need to be notable. Good. ❌. &mdash; regards, Revi 15:47, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Feel free! Simple fact is, they all are notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:52, 6 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - Withdrawing isn't an option as there's a standing delete !vote, Anyway 's bang on - Consensus at AFDs are to keep high schools per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. – Davey 2010 Talk 02:56, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - per long standing precedent as documented at OUTCOMES and evidenced by thousands of AfD closures. However, the article could do with a massive CE and workover per WP:WPSCH/AG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:49, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete unless independent source (not the school's website) confirms school's existence in which case Keep. This is a requirement for non-deletion per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Katzenlibrary (talk) 16:11, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Wrong,, please read OUTCOMES again. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:14, 13 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep there can not be any doubt about the existence of the school, see Seoul government site saying that there's a bus station at the school and this person (which doesn't look like a hoax) claims to have been an English teacher there. Kraxler (talk) 16:59, 13 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.