Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jinx (novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Canley (talk) 12:31, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Jinx (novel)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

individual book not notable; notable author is not "so historically significant" per WP:BOOK. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 19:47, 25 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Canley (talk) 06:31, 2 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   —Pixelface (talk) 09:27, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep A Google news search for jinx "meg cabot" turns up some sources that could be cited. --Pixelface (talk) 10:01, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Some articles from Google News that establish notability: Here's a book review from the St Petersburg Times (the review was written by a 12-year-old, but we don't have an age limit on authors of WP:RS!). There is another article here 'Jinx' connects Iowa, N.Y. girls that is behind a paywall. Bláthnaid  13:35, 3 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.