Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JioMeet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Jio. No consensus to Keep, and a rough consensus to Redirect as an ATD. (non-admin closure) Britishfinance (talk) 11:46, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

JioMeet

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. After it was moved to draft space by another user, the author blanked the draft and recreated the article, so while I normally would move this to draft space to allow it to develop further, not sure that would be productive here. DannyS712 (talk) 12:31, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. DannyS712 (talk) 12:32, 1 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Fails WP:NSOFT.  D My Son  13:21, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect: to Jio. It doesn't pass WP:NSOFT, not because there is no reliable and significant coverage (,, , , - these could qualify as reliable and significant), but because Notability is not temporary. Similarly, a burst of coverage (often around product announcements) does not automatically make a product notable.. All coverage is around the same date i.e date of the app's announcement. -  Harsh  19:56, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -  Harsh  20:23, 1 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Jio#Jio_apps, where it is mentioned per WP:ATD (t &#183; c)  buidhe  08:48, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Product is notable. Passes GNG and gains slightly more notability with praise from NITI Aayog's CEO, plus the Aatmanirbhar movement initiated by Modi. 1 2 3. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 14:49, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I think you have not sufficiently countered the point I made. - Harsh (talk) 22:19, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * That's up to the closing admin (or non-admin) to take into consideration. In the meantime, here is more: Zoom considering legal action against Jio], another one on Zoom and JioMeet, this time detailing the latter's downloads and an Op-Ed that looks at the comption here. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 01:24, 10 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete,, are you just pasting reference links from the article? Your second link is dead. Anyway, I went through the sources and I don't think there is any convincing coverage that is not just from the announcement or something. why do you mention it has received praise? That is irrelevant. It doesn't matter if it is great or not, why do you think that would matter? The only thing that matters is the coverage and if there a sufficient amount. Why do you mention that it was praised by a movement initiated by Modi? That is such an indirect appeal to authority! --Ysangkok (talk) 23:24, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * The link isn't dead. I forgot to put a space between the link and 2. It's very much a live one. Why is it relevant? By that line of reasoning, 80% of Wikipedia articles would be up for deletion because a bulk of the coverage rests on it being given 'significant' coverage. Indirect appeal to authority? That's very silly. Also, no need to ping me twice in the same message. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:30, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Also, I most *certainly did not* paste links from the article. I'm not as unaware of policies as you seem to be insinuating. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 01:24, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 19:23, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 19:25, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 19:25, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Darkwind (talk) 00:42, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect Not really non notable. But given that it doesn't have sufficient sources specifically mentioning it, it should be redirected to Jio as it's coverage won't endure for long on independent unless it becomes extremely popular. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 05:57, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete The best sources offered up are just articles saying it's been released. But we need significant coverage of a topic to actually write an article. Fails WP:GNG. – FenixFeather (talk) (Contribs) 00:19, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect and perhaps merge a bit of the content to Jio if need be. -Kj cheetham (talk) 07:38, 17 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.